- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted under WP:SNOW as blatent hoax. ➥the Epopt 22:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Clearly a hoax. Sir Isaac Lime 22:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. The Onion is not a research source. Captainktainer 22:47, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, unverifiable hoax. Royboycrashfan
22:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC) - Speedy delete. Grafikm_fr 22:52, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sir Isaac Lime: What the fuck? I don't see how you could be such a motherfucker, accusing people of fucking hoaxes, remove that deletion notice immediatly or I will fucking hunt you down. -
Anonymous 23:40 18 april 2006 (UTC)
- To Sir Isaac Fucking Lime: I would like to see some proof of why this is a hoax and how you can go around making all those assumptions. This is as truthful as the penis in my pants, not that you can say the same about anything...
User:GeniusLevel 23:55, 18 april 2006 (UTC)Both comments above actually by GreesyGeorge (talk · contribs) at 22:43, 18 April 2006. (Refactoring and tag added by Calton | Talk 02:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.