Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filth/Body to Body, Job to Job

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Swans discography. Merger can be done from the article's history  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Filth/Body to Body, Job to Job (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is unnecessary. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Swans discography as a possible search term. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Swans discography per Lugnuts. --Michig (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Why delete instead of redirect? This user has created about a dozen of these album deletion requests and has yet to explain why they should be deleted and not simply redirected. Note that if they are redirected, the categories should remain and {{r from album}} should be added. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Has secondary sources. Compilation albums are still notable, especially when collecting multiple albums.--Soul Crusher (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.