Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy X-3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT, nn game.--Sss666 05:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the game is notable but the article is in desperate need of attention form FinalFantasy editors. NeoFreak 06:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. There is no Final Fantasy X-3 and no such game has ever been announced or even hinted at by Square Enix. TJ Spyke 07:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. TJ Spyke 07:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Wikipedia is not a rumor site. Havok (T/C/c) 08:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is a classic crystal ball situation. Disagree with nominator - the game would be notable, it just doesn't necessarily exist, and there's no sign that it does. Kill it, don't give it a phoenix down. Captainktainer * Talk 08:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete hoax ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 08:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional Delete: unless sources show up, this is WP:OR. (|-- UlTiMuS 10:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, though I don't feel like speedying it. I assume good faith. - Richardcavell 10:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsourced. Can be recreated if this is ever confirmed. VegaDark 11:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as hoax. However if sources do come up after deletion, I wont oppose its recreation. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 12:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete "Rumoured to be in development" means it doesn't exist. BTLizard 12:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. To all the speedy deleters, there's no speedy deletion criteria for hoaxes. ColourBurst 15:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentActually, a hoax would be eligible for speedy deletion under the "Pure Vandalism" rule CSD G3, the vanity rule CSD A7. See bottom of the CSD page "Hoaxes: Articles that present unverifiable and probably false ideas, theories, or subjects. Occasionally these can be deleted as vandalism if the article is obviously ridiculous, but remotely plausible articles should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum."
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Svde 16:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This page should not exist until another site at least hints at a rumour of this game's existance. --Benjaminx 18:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral The only possible hint to this game comes from [IGN]. I doubt the credibility of the article, though, because news such as that would definately have been jumped on by multiple sources. Kopf1988 00:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Dennis The TIger 01:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as hoax. No sources, no evidence, no reason to exist. Daveydweeb (^chat/_patch) 03:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sourced speculation and "possible hints" that the game is in works should be mentioned in any of the existing articles (X or X-2 articles, perhaps). There's no reason to go for an article yet - if Squenix goes forth and says "yes, X-3 is in works" and there's something more besides that, too, then an article, but not before. Right now, the article is in a sad state and will not improve unless there's actual substance to the claims. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. Final Fantasy X has only one sequel, and no more have been announced. If it's being made by someone other than Square, then it should still be deleted as non-notable.--Frenchman113 on wheels! 15:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia ain't a crystal ball. --Ixfd64 19:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Burn it with fiar! Seriously, as interesting as it might be, no crystal balls. Axem Titanium 01:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above comments. RFerreira 19:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm a big fan of the Final Fantasy series and I never heard of any such rumor. --Pinkkeith 23:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.