Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Solution (Book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted/userfied. non admin closure TheWeakWilled (T * G) 20:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final Solution (Book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refuted PROD. This book appears to be completely non-notable. Indeed, looking at the talk page, I'm not even sure if the book exists. Note that all the references are sourcing the history behind the content of the book, nothing to do with the book itself. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, thanks Joe Chill for adding the template on the article. I didn't forget, but I use Twinkle and it does flub sometimes for no apparent reason--Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self-published book. [1] No reason to think it notable -- not even in WorldCat. i recommend a SNOW. DGG ( talk ) 23:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom DRosin (talk) 12:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the author of this article I would like to request to move it back into my user space until I complete some of the tie in articles I wish to write. My series would include, The Final Solution (Jason Bailey), Final Solution (Lawrence Graham), and Final Solution (Richard Peck). The idea of these articles is to compare the difference between the coined term "Final Solution" historically to the fictional uses for it in literature. I understand that the article does not appear notable on its own but I believe when it is included in my series, this topic of comparison will be notable. I will wait until I get your permission before moving the article back to my user space. Thank you. 09:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eraser1 (talk • contribs)

Each article has to be notable in it's own right. This article will keep getting deleted until you show some evidence that the book has attracted the attention of the wider world. Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no reason not to attempt the general article you planned, but it should discuss only those books that are actually notable, and at this point your book is not among them. DGG ( talk ) 18:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's not planning to write a general article. He apparently wants to write an article like this one on each of the books he names.Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eraser1 has moved this article into userspace.Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the record. What can be moved can be un-moved for no good reason. NBeale (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.