Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Table Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable vanity entry, primarily added to promote unknown group and site; delinked article prior to afd 2005 11:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Yes, we'd all love a page, but we can't have one. - Stevecov 11:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - needs proof of notability.--Andeh 11:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why is the article being deleted?— Preceding unsigned comment added by T-rex-craig (talk • contribs)

• Delete. Even if the members are notable (debatable), their formation of a "team" is not—especially when the word team is being used to imply a relationship that does not exist according to the article's text. They don't function as a team, but rather appear to be simply travelling buddies who play independently in the same tournaments. How is the team designation worthy of an autonomous article? --Fuhghettaboutit 12:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. IMO could have been speedied A7. Fan1967 15:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable and advertisement, not to mention that guys that play at the same tournaments do not make up a "team". For the record, I follow poker like it's my job, but I've never heard of any of those guys. -- Kicking222 22:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.