Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Whistle Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Whistle Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A publication that was launched two months ago that isn't notable yet →Σ τ c. 01:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems unlikely that an "amateur/grassroots football magazine for the Coventry and Warwickshire region" that has published exactly one issue will have generated sufficient coverage to be considered notable, and web search bears this out. Zero Gnews hits, and general Ghits are primary or otherwise non-independent, directory listings and other routine notices, and just a faint bit of notice in the fandom/blogdom world. If in time they achieve notability, then an article would be welcome, but it's far WP:TOOSOON right now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there appears to be no coverage in WP:RS, and as indicated above might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.