Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finance & Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Finance & Development

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A journal of the IMF, but notability is not inherited Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to International Monetary Fund. No reason not to cover their publication on that page.4meter4 (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Indexed in Scopus, which meets WP:NJournals. Article needs a lot of work, but that's not a reason to delete. --Randykitty (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per RK. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Keep; ibid above reasoning. Either one works depending on which option is more popular InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.