Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial Performances and Quality in Services Award
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Financial Performances and Quality in Services Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources, or claim of notability. This may be a part of a series of articles that are made by socks of an organisation. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Technology_for_peace
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harry_Anastasiou Obermallen (talk) 22:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete ROTM business award. Mccapra (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing notable about this award. JayJayWhat did I do? 23:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, no nothing. Delete. --LordPeterII (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non notable award lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.