Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial democracy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Jake Wartenberg 01:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Financial democracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure Original Research Synthesis essay. Constested prod. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It does sound like the author is trying to push a viewpoint. While I'm interested in having this discussion, it's not going to be on Wikipedia. However, if the author wants to start a blog and post it there... Pat Payne (talk) 00:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Interesting essay, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 00:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as essay. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this essay. BTW, a good lesson for essay writing is "never cite a dictionary"--unless it's the OED, of course. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR. (article consists entirely of original research) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with apologies to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. --Milowent (talk) 04:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Original research. Joe Chill (talk) 20:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.