- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Promotion of non-notable new product, one Google hit (company web site), no G-News hits. Quote from the article: "Unfortunately, finger chux are still in the early phases. There is not much information about them." Deprodded. Accurizer 11:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. These may become notable later, so the article could be recreated but only after the product and company gains some third party sources. Gwernol 12:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for advertising. --Coredesat 12:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 14:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Seems to be vanity/self promotion/spam. skorpion 00:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising of a non-notable product Kevin 01:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Voice of Treason 23:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.