- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted as nonsense with no real content. Neil ☎ 14:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fireween night (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable neologism (or would it be protolgism?). And nn celebration. 2 Google hits for Wikipedia. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per "this term will hopefully be recognised". That in itself is an admission of non-recognition and lack of notability, nevermind the fact that google only returns 7 hits, all of which (besides the wiki article in question), are not worthy of referencing this alleged event. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn neologism. Chris! ct 21:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non notable nelogisim, see WP:NEO. STORMTRACKER 94 21:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Doctorfluffy 22:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Bungle. JuJube 01:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.