Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firgelli Automations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firgelli Automations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article comes off more as a puff/promotional piece for a small company and the company owner. This company does not appear to be notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Stesmo (talk) 06:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No sources - PR releases and other junk don't count. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable. Featured on a episode of a TV show?--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article by a WP:SPA account, sourced predominantly to PR. Those sources that do exist confirm existence but do not support the notability for the firm. AllyD (talk) 12:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.