- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Firmoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New article, PROD has been removed without comment. Whole article is promotional and does not show why this organisation is notable. asnac (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Any article that begins with mentioning its subject's facebook fans and only has social media as source should be speedily deleted. complainer (talk) 13:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources, none found, the claims are dubious and the whole thing looks like spam to me. Ubelowme U Me 14:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable, 3rd party sources. It also looks a little bit like an ad "in disguise". JoeGazz84 ♦ 19:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.