Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FirstCapital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FirstCapital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A verbatim (to exclude "first capital" with a space) Google search firstcapital turns up nothing to demonstrate that this company meets WP:GNG. Largoplazo (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks really shady, and I would suggest to Business Insider that they vet people who may be running a Ponzi scheme, altho, to counter-point https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/581860/new-years-honours-2017-full-list.pdf does list "Ms Hazel Caroline MOORE Chairman and Co-founder, FirstCapital. For services to Entrepreneurship and Innovation."

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. The sources are not about FirstCapital. Just a mention. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO; an unremarkable private investment bank going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources are all from reliable publications and are not bias. The company is significant to several major deals and is chaired by a women who is top of her industry and has an OBE.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maurycs (talk • contribs) — Maurycs (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete as failing GNG. The article seems to be more about Hazel Moore than about this investment bank. No sources given on how this bank itself is notable. 331dot (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.