- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Premature closing and Speedy Delete of all listed articles by Deckiller because of discovered copyright violations (CSD A8) from firststrike.totalbf2.com. A message has been placed on Mathieu121's talk page describing this incident and the site's policy toward copyright violations and non notable content. — Deckiller 21:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An apparently unfinished mod for Battlefield 2, set in the Star Wars universe. No evidence of notability, no links, nothing. Delete (and redirect to first strike). - Mike Rosoft 15:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The user also created articles about the following items from the game:
- Imperial Shock Trooper
- Concussion Grenades - now redirected to hand grenade
- Fragmentation Grenades - now redirected to hand grenade
- BlasTech T-21 Light Repeating Blaster Rifle
- Krupx MiniMag Proton Torpedo Launcher
- Glop Grenades
- Bacta Canisters
- Fusion Cutter
- Merr-Sonn TB-47 Time Bombs
- Targeting Computer
- Destructive Electro-Magnetic Pulse 2 Gun
- Imperial Pilo
- Imperial Heavy Repeater Rifle
- AT-ST Pilot
- Cryoban Grenades
- Ammo Dispenser
- BlasTech E-Web Heavy Repeating Blaster
- Thermal Detonators - now redirected to List of Star Wars heavy weapons
- Flash-Bang Detonators (- now redirected to hand grenade Kevin_b_er 07:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- Laser Trip Mines
- Electrobinoculars
- Tenloss Disrupter Sniper Rifle
- Imperial Scout Pistol
- Also:
- More found by Deckiller:
- Packered Mortar Gun
- Golan Arms HH-15 Portable Missile Launcher
- Biotic Grenades
- Rail Charges Launcher
- Golan Arms CR-1 Blaster Cannon
- Delete all. - Mike Rosoft 17:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirectChange vote to delete all Per nom what is this Wookieepedia now? BJK 15:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Strong Delete All per nom. Tevildo 16:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete all per nom. Pascal.Tesson 17:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Investigate Further If there's a way to salvage the pages in a category of Star Wars weapons by verifying that the weapons existed in the two trilogies or expanded universe, that might be the better approach. If the weapons did not exist in any other Star Wars publication, then Delete. Targetter 18:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would delete the BF2 Mod's page, though... Targetter 18:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Interwiki and delete. There must be a Star Wars fancruft wiki. The author made no attempt to establish context so we can assume they thought they were writing in that wiki already. -- RHaworth 19:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete First Strike per nom, transwiki the rest to Wookieepedia. --Coredesat 21:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. (Although some of this might be useful if it were simply renamed 'X (Star Wars)')--Dougall 21:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All per nom. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 22:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all articles associated, making sure to hang onto articles like Carrack-class light cruiser which are included on some pages. Jammo (SM247) 00:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All Non-notable game - with the existence of List of Star Wars weapons and Wookieepedia, I am confident that the Jedi watching over all that stuff will restore any weapons/people deleted here if they turn out to be notable. Looking at these (as a non-expert), they look pretty unnotable. Use the delete force. --DaveG12345 07:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to say something, before u decided to delete this, I have been hard at wrok getting it set up. I am NOT by no way finished, this is just being done as I go along, for right now I have exams (finals) right now and I promise it WILL be hdone to the ways of wikipedia and its neutral view. So please take that into consideration. Mathieu121 11:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is not all that difficult to tell that these articles are well under the notability line for Wikipedia. Mathieu121 - I recommend you read up on the policies of Wikipedia because it is a shame to see so much work go to waste. If you familiarise yourself better with what articles and content are acceptable on Wikipedia then your efforts will go to good use, and everyone wins. Remy B 11:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTICE: all of the above articles (including the parent article) are copyvios from this site:[1]. These should all be speedy deleted. — Deckiller 20:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.