Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First day worship
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect for now; turn it into a disambig if needed (Liberatore, 2006). 10:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplication of another article here Sabbath#Basis_of_First_Day_Observance. (Not worth marking to be merged, because they are pretty much identical). -Ladybirdintheuk 15:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect it - CheNuevara 15:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Instead of merging, editors can contribute what is notable to Sabbath#Basis_of_First_Day_Observance. --HResearcher 10:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - might need to be turned into a disambig, as it's quite similar to Quaker terms such as First day school, Meeting for worship, etc. (I'm curious whether these will be red links...) SB_Johnny | talk 12:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Another good point, Johnny. --HResearcher 15:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. If someone sees a need for a dab, the redirect can be changed in the future. Vegaswikian 21:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect -- Whpq 01:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.