Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First in Assamese Cinema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First in Assamese Cinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Along with these related lists:

List of awardees in Assamese Cinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Classic films in Assamese Cinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

are overexpansive and/or indiscriminate collection of facts related to Assamese cinema, most of are already covered in other awards and cinema articles. (The latter article also is intrinsic POV/OR.) Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete All: Simply copy-pasted from the link given in the three articles:http://www.rupaliparda.com/english/History.htm. Since, this link is listed as an external link in Assamese cinema article, there is no need of these copy-paste articles.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete First in Assamese Cinema and Classic films in Assamese Cinema, but keep List of awardees in Assamese Cinema, since only the awardees list has a well-defined inclusion criterion. The fact that the award information is available off-site is not a reason to delete a list (that is true for many, if not most, featured lists too) - hopefully the article will expand to include information about the awards etc. Abecedare (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.