Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish and boat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fish and boat

Non-notable fishing magazine of local interest only. Entirely unsourced. Contested PROD, no reason given for contesting Mattinbgn\^talk 13:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 13:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NDelete - this is a non-notable magazine with no third party reliable sources.--S_RX 13:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NOTE; non-notable magazine, no independent media coverage. Ғїяеѕкатея^talk 15:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, while I've found enough to verify that this paper indeed exists, I'm not able to find anything to verify that it's particularly notable. I did encounter a tremendous number of false positives when searching on Google for mentions though, so it's possible that there might be something hidden in all that (hence the 'weak' qualifier). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 15:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Notability not established. The author needs to prove notability. Also, the article seems to be nothing but blatant advertising.--Lester 21:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This list of Australian publications (selected by Tourism NT) shows that, with circulation of about 10,000, it has among the lowest circulation of the 70 or so Australian magazines it has selected, and is outranked by the likes of Queensland Fishing Monthly, Sydney Gay And Lesbian Visitors Guide and British Balls - a fair distance from notability methinks. Murtoa (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Murtoa. Completely non-notable. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 00:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It should stay, as this is NOTABLE TO AUSTRALIANS....we haven't heard of your yanky papers either. Don't be stupid, it is relevant and there is no reason to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.108.102 (talk • contribs)
Strong delete. Obscure magazine with low circulation; no non-trivial citations from reliable sources.--T B C ♣§♠ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 05:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.