Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitness to Practice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sango 123 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur Transplants, Fitness to Practice, London Underground (song)

A band, album and song. Questionable compliance with WP:MUSIC:

Released one album
No chart hits according to articles
No national or international tour
Vague assertions of notability, mostly around the unsourced claim of being an "internet fad"

Previous nomination - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Transplants (no consensus). kingboyk 08:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all - At the very least merge, but not delete. They have significantly penetrated the internet as their high ghits from disparate sources suggests (we're not talking forks or directories; we're talking individual sites with comments in context). They have featured in two Edinburgh Fringe shows with reviews on Chortle. "London Underground song" gets 301,000 ghits. The FtP article gets significant enough attention itself (see edit history) indicating that it is of significant interest. Actually, because of the amount of space the parody information takes, a merge might look a bit messy anyway. According to their blurb for their fringe show, they have independent comment from two "quality" papers: The Telegraph and The Sunday Times (this satisfies WP:MUSIC's criteria). A link to a mention in The Torygraph is here. The JPS ^{talk to me} 10:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Band and song were highly notable as a fad in the United Kingdom last year, even before WP:MUSIC is considered. Any British teenager could sing this song back to you if you ask them. See JPS' sources for verification, if you need more there will be ample available. Jdcooper 10:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JPS. Techieed 11:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per JPS. MLA 11:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 15:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.