Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaming ball round

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xoloz (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flaming ball round (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not referenced and not notable. Editor keeps removing notability and unreferenced tag rather than improving the article, seeming to indicate no intention to improve. Editor keeps adding spam link, seeming to indicate real intention for article, to promote the product on a website. Arthur (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not surprised they're not trying to improve the article. They got a whole bunch of warnings, but no helpful comments as to how to improve the entry. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge I don't think this ammo needs a single page. There is a need for specialist shotgun ammunition article. I can't find one. scope_creep (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless the author can come up with some evidence of notability. I cannot find a single reference via Google, unconnected to one or another Wikipedia version, for even the existence of the round. Tim Ross·^talk 17:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article does not establish the notability requirement. Mikemill (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.