This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 22:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. --fvw* 00:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obviously. Friday (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete bandity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, no AMG entry. Jaxl | talk 00:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Promotional page and fails to meet WP:MUSIC criteria. There ought to be a speedy delete rule for these endless band promotion articles. — C Maylett 00:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn CLW 07:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Lack of "notability" is not a criterion for deletion. -- Reinyday, 13:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- But not meeting WP:MUSIC certainly is. Delete--Isotope23 17:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Maylett. Kertrats | Talk 14:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: When the band is not notable, an article is advertising, which is a grounds for deletion. Geogre 18:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: for reasons cited above.--Alhutch 23:12, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Flash fire? Else, just delete. --Celestianpower hab 12:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't meet WP:MUSIC. Shauri 19:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all. --Blackcap | talk 18:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.