- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FledgeWing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete as nn website ZagZagg (talk) 01:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I highly doubt that this website is notable because the first three sources are the same article and the fourth and fifth sources are trivial mentions. Fails WP:WEB. Joe Chill (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is a brand new web site (February 2009 according to the article,) which is far too short of reaching any level of notability, user base, or anything else for that matter. It is basically a start-up, and is using Wikipedia as a way of getting the word out. Groink (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: They have no mention of user numbers (Facebook amassed over 1m users in five months), but I added two more sources which I think are pertinent towards their notoriety. Nre207 (talk) 08:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.