Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexiMusic Wave Editor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Michig (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- FlexiMusic Wave Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found a bunch of trivial mentions, but no notability. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This review was the only significant coverage I could find, and it alone does not establish notability. Chris (talk | contribs) 20:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I tried to find reviews, but aside from the above Top Ten Reviews (which I'm not totally sure is a notable review in itself, as the site aggregates from elsewhere on the web), the only other reviews I could find were user generated ones on cnet. So regrettably I don't think it can pass WP:RS. --Ritchie333 (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.