Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flindt Landing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Flindt Landing Station. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flindt Landing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Flindt Landing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate of Flindt Landing station. I would have boldly redirected, however it was recently deprodded based on the existence of sources for the VIA Rail station and a nearby camp. –dlthewave ☎ 21:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 21:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Flindt Landing station. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Flindt Landing station. Suggest a lead sentence for the merged article of "Flindt Landing railway station is a railway point REFERENCE using {{CGNDB}} with CGNDB parameter FBEJH and railway station etc." --papageno (talk) 03:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Before agreeing with merge or redirect, what is the notability for an article of Flindt Landing station? It appears to be a train station where one can alight to camp and go fishing in the wilds. Is that suitable for an encylopaedic article? Wouldn't that be better included in a more general article? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its pretty marginal but its better than Flindt Landing, if it turns out not to be notable then we can just continue to roll the snowball. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.