Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip flop friday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flip flop friday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Looks like complete nonsense (and nothing comes up on Google). I've resisted speedy deleting because I want to be sure. Waggers 12:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This is definitely not notable. LittleOldMe 12:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Don't worry, I'm pretty sure this is nonsense too. Lankiveil 12:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Kind of sounds like something made up at school one day. --Cyrus Andiron 12:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki then Delete - this is a perfectly genuine term see Ghits here. However, though there are many sources, the content of this article seems nonsense with most instances of 'Flip Flop Friday' being charitable fund-raising with employees making a donation in return for wearing flip flops at work. I am doubtful if there is enough to be said about it to make an article. TerriersFan 16:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. TerriersFan brings up a good point in that some employers will do this, which would ordinarily give me cause for a transwiki, but here, the article starts to ramble. Can't justfiy a keep for this one. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - ah, thanks, I have clarified my proposed action. TerriersFan 22:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the article as-is is little more than sneaky spam for a sandal company: "they are by far the best quality of flipflops that the inventor has ever worn and have a life time guarantee..." Come on. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.