Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flippase recognition target

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to FLP-FRT recombination. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flippase recognition target (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like gibberish. No refs. No indication of notability. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and Redirect to FLP-FRT recombination. (Or just redirect – most if not all of the content is already there.) It's not gibberish to me, and it's notable enough, as the Google book and scholar searches show, but there does not seem to be much you can say about it beyond the context of FLP–FRT recombination technology.  --Lambiam 07:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I see now this was created by a cut-and-paste job from FLP-FRT recombination, and not even from the wiki text, but from the screen output; hence the lack of formatting and the non-referring references "[1]" and "[2]". Changing my recommendation to just "Redirect".  --Lambiam 07:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 20:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.