Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlippingBook (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FlippingBook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Deleted few years ago, it was recreated or rewritten by a WP:SPA. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the AFD box above saving everyone trying to find it manually. –Davey2010^Talk 17:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the article is still questionable for the applicable notability and there's nothing better convincing. Notifying the only noticeably active AfDer Carrite. SwisterTwister talk 19:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Still essentially commercial in intent. Carrite (talk) 02:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.