- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism. Valrith 04:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, protologism, no sources outside the one forum. NawlinWiki 06:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — per nom & NawlinWiki --AbsolutDan (talk) 06:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, self-admitted neologism. JIP | Talk 09:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. For this one entry, I wish you could actually copyright a term as the author suggests, because then it would be speedyable. hehe. Irongargoyle 00:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for stupid in-jokes. Danny Lilithborne 01:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.