Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FloodSim (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 23:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FloodSim

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as COI for 15 years. Wikipedia is not a permanent webhost for COI content. BD2412 T 22:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 22:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete however please note the sourcing linked in the original deletion discussion. I think that sourcing in itself doesn't quite hit the substance required of notability, as they seem to largely be primary sources and "brief" comments as acknowledged. Could be more out there if a WP:BEFORE hasn't been done. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Falls short of passing GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.