Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow binding system
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Flow binding system (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A quick search revealed some press releases but no significant coverage. Article lacks references, and subject apparently not notable. What do others think? --Nuujinn (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam about a particular company's product. References are not to Reliable Sources, they are to blogs. Everything found on a Google search relates to the company; nothing much found at Google News (one mention at the Colorado Springs Gazette [1]). --MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, just to be clear that that's my !vote. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.