Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flowsense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flowsense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested speedy A7. Neologism, fails WP:NEO. Per the last line of the article, it also fails WP:NFT, and by comparing the name mentioned therein with the username who authored it, it also fails WP:COI. YechielMan 03:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up while watching Ultimate Frisbee one day. janejellyroll 03:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO. The last line, "The term flowsense was coined by Jake "Frogger" Taylor while watching Harvard RedLine play at the Ultimate Players Association's College Nationals in 2006." says it all, especially since the article was penned by Froggerjake. Neil916 (Talk) 05:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Sheesh.  RGTraynor  14:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable. -- Casmith_789 (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:NEO -- Whpq 16:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Just because someone contests a speedy doesn't mean an admin can't speedy-delete an obvious case anyway. This is pretty obvious, IMHO. Realkyhick 19:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, per all the above. Agree it should really be a speedy. Goodnightmush^Talk 20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete nonsense and non-notable. Acalamari 20:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Neil916. -- LeCour^T:C 21:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Neologism. ffm ✎talk 13:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.