- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Flupples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a non-notable puppet show. Only 8 hits for "Flupples -wiki -youtube +puppet". Fails WP:N, WP:RS andy (talk) 10:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete according to the article, went from a non-notable street performance to... a non-notable youtube performance. The lone Youtube video I could find had 22 views, so this isn't exactly a youtube sensation or anything. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per Starblind. Joe Chill (talk) 22:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.
- Delete, not notable, no reliable independent sources.The-Pope (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.