- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 06:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Flushing Farm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable - fails WP:GNG Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
deleteupmerge to Round Maple as previously mentioned in this cfd Using google to search for the buildings there's nothing of apparent substance to raise any expectation of possible furture expansion. Noting that this building is a Grade II listed building and lacks any additional significance beyond when it was built. Gnangarra 11:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Delete. Couldn't find any sources to demonstrate notability and there's not really anything worth merging. Jimmy Pitt talk 14:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this is a listed building, which probably could have more content added to it in the future, It's main sauce at the monent is http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-276465-the-flushing-edwardstone, but there may still be more sources. I may also re format Round Maple for if this article is not notable and needs to be merged. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 11:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It's only a grade II listed building, which isn't very remarkable. There's probably over 100 Grade II listed buildings in Long Melford according to the source you quote (http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/england/suffolk/long+melford) and I don't think that on that kind of basis that they would all deserve a Wikipedia article. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- not all that remarkable, in England approximately 374,000 listings of which 344,000 are Grade II, [1] Gnangarra 12:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It's only a grade II listed building, which isn't very remarkable. There's probably over 100 Grade II listed buildings in Long Melford according to the source you quote (http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/england/suffolk/long+melford) and I don't think that on that kind of basis that they would all deserve a Wikipedia article. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Grade II buildings are not inherently notable & there is nothing to suggest that this article could ever be expanded beyond the basic EH listing information. It was originally covered by a sentence in Round Maple which can be reinstated. Nancy talk 17:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, insufficient notability for an article. Richard Harvey (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or merge to its nearest proper settlement.Kudpung (talk) 12:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Which is Round Maple (with a section on the topic) if not notable enough to have a separate article. It has http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-276465-the-flushing-edwardstone, which is a reliable source anyway. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 17:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable as per Kudpung, Nancy, etc--J3Mrs (talk) 20:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.