Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flutewise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's not much there, but if anyone wants a copy in their userspace, all you have to do is ask. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flutewise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flutewise is indeed an organization for young flute players: you'll find that in the first four hits on google. Other than that, there's no indication that the group is notable, and as such I see little reason to keep it here. Suggest userfying until the article can get any relevant content at all. Two sentences just doesn't cut it, and I don't know where the third-party sources will come from (the person userfying it should determine that!). — Timneu22 · talk 16:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no-notable group. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found some published references from news archives, ~~in which I may add in just a few moments.~~ Actually, I found more info on James Galway rather than Flutewise. Minima c (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (GregJackP (talk) 01:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.