- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. 00:22, 27 February 2012 Y (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Flying Meat" (A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Flying Meat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD § A7: every ISV develops software, that's why they are known by this name. If the products are notable, they should have their articles. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy snow delete per A7. Non-notable corporation and written like an advertisement. G11 may also apply. ChromaNebula (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.