Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbidden Zone Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forbidden Zone Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODded with reason "Unsourced, only 1 issue published and there is no evidence that this one issue made any impact". Article dePRODded with reason "Removed proposed deletion: Material has been added clarifying that magazine was first mass publishing of some(now) established talent &had unique mix of talent. No media publicity at publication so impact hard to judge. Distributed internationally". Impact is indeed "hard to judge": even the article creator cannot come up with a single independent source (or even a non-independent one, for that matter). Fails WP:GNG and WP:V, hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Perhaps if the magazine had managed to make it byond a single issue, it might have attracted the critical notice needed to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. -- Whpq (talk) 14:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable and one issue. SL93 (talk) 22:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – After searching, not finding coverage in reliable sources for this one-off publication. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.