- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to General Binding Corporation. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fordigraph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product which has a similar name to other products but no references to prove notability, Sadads (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rediect to parent company. Guy (Help!) 23:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to General Binding Corporation. While I'm confident that we'll eventually have an article on this brand, I don't have time to work on it right now. This being the second time it's been considered for deletion, see Talk:Fordigraph, I think something needs to be done. Andrewa (talk) 12:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to General Binding Corporation would seem to be appropriate. Narthring (talk • contribs) 15:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.