- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 22:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Formulatrix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Concerns of notability. I'm not hellbent on deletion, however. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 23:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. With a total of 27 employees, it'll be hard-pressed to pass WP:CORP, although I have to admit I didn't review secondary source coverage. Owen× ☎ 13:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I was able to find press releases and rehashed PR but not any coverage that would be considered significant and independent. -- Whpq (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.