- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Forrest Higgs and Brosis Innovations
- Forrest Higgs - article created and written by himself (user:plaasjaapie)
- Brosis Innovations - and his company, again created and written by himself
This is a malformed nomination by User:88.111.213.77 (who placed the contents directly onto the AfD page). Corrected here. ColourBurst 22:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both, 'm off to advise the user about WP:AUTO and WP:VAIN. Guy 23:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both: Smells of pork. Subjects not notable: 27 unique Ghits, the majority self-posted stuff by Higgs, and/or from agoravox or agoravoice, or wiki mirrors and other online dictionaries. the Brosis website is an amateurish Frames jobbie, and no alexa rank. Ohconfucius 07:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi People!
Just to set the record straight.
Yes, I did write the short biography and the little entry about my consultancy. If that is forbidden, then by all means we must remove the entries.
In fact, I did the entry when I was working on the RepRap article some months ago so that the RepRap article "People" section would have something to link to. I didn't really have any motive beyond that. As you can see both of the entries were very brief and to the point. As well, they've not seen much change since their posting.
None of the other intentions that I've seen suggested in your guidelines, viz, self-promotion, business seeking and the like were in the least intended or real. I have a full consulting load and am not seeking either new business or new customers. I'm also approaching the end of my career rather than it's beginning, so I'm not really very interested in self promotion, either.
You noticed that my "company" website is a mess. It certainly is. It was last active in the late 1990's and I just reinstituted the ___domain. Just why, I'm not completely sure since the ___domain really has no point. The old, old main page is partially up. It's not commercial and it needs a rewrite, something I haven't had time to attend to, since I stopped doing text mining consulting a long time ago.
As I have said, I had no ulterior motives in doing the entries for my name and little company beyond making links for the reprap article. If this warrants their being deleted, fine. If there is something that wants doing so that the entries can be brought up to an acceptable Wikipedia standard, I would certainly appreciate a little help in that regard.
Thanks,
Forrest Higgs aka plaasjaapie
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.