- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 23:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Forrest Lin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
According to the linked website, the subject's claim to notability is that he's the unofficial 53rd-fastest solver of the cube. Pseudomonas(talk) 14:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I suppose WP:ATHLETE is the relevant guideline, and the competition he's allegedly notable for does not appear in the official WCA listings ([1]) for 2009, which is presumably the "highest amateur level" of this particular competitive activity. Tevildo (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.