- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 15:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fortess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Company. Unable to locate any verifiable sources with significant coverage. Article contains no implication of notability. Aka042 (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I can't find significant coverage of this company in a reliable source either. Glenfarclas (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and replace the spam-filled article with a redirect to Fortification. I think it is a common misspelling of Fortress. Alexius08 (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.