Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forthbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forthbox

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Forthbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. There are a large number of citations on the page to cryptocurrency-specific websites and to press releases, neither of which are considered to be independent reliable sources for the purposes of corporate notability (per WP:NCRYPTO). Crypto-specific websites cited in the article include Coinbase, CoinMarketCap, Binance, CoinCarp, CoinGecko, cryptobuyingtips, Coinspeaker, and Smart Liquidity Network, while the remaining sources are composed of press releases. The sole exception to all this is the Tweet, which is obviously not independent. I'm also not able to find sourcing that would satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. As such, I believe that this article should be deleted for failing the relevant notability guideline. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Caribbean. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete like the abundance of cryptospam we have, this one isn't unique or notable. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the references are either primary, promotional or database entries in nature. Merko (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.