Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortnightly Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 10:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fortnightly Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Abandoned by its creator, and there's insufficient information about its notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep So notable even I have heard of it! Article is completely insufficient, but The Fortnightly Review was published for nearly 90 years and has articles in the Encyclopedia Britannica (15th ed), The Oxford Companion to English Literature (4th Ed) and the Cambridge Guide to Literature in English, and I've only the checked books on the bookshelf near my computer. Maegara 07:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I didn't even reach for the bookshelf, I just found several sources by Google Books; picked the easiest-reading one since I'm no expert in this area (e.g. none of the names ring any bells with me, I have to look them all up) and started expanding it a bit. cab 08:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a famous literary magazine, founded by like some old writer type dude name of Anthony Trollope among others, and notable even if it does date from the dim and distant days before Nintendo and reality TV. It published 3 novels by Trollope in serial form, 2 by George Meredith and poets ranging from Algernon Swinburne and Rossetti to Yeats and Pound. The article's been expanded now. Nick mallory 09:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Abandoned or not, there's more than enough here already to underwrite the magazine's notability. Ach, die Jugend von heute! BTLizard 14:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auf gut Deutsch da liegt der Hund begraben. Nick mallory 15:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, excellent save. Corvus cornix 23:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.