Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortress in Flames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Crüxshadows. J04n(talk page) 14:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fortress in Flames

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this review but that hardly meets WP:GNG. This can't really be merged since the article in unsourced so I brought it here. Deletion or redirect are both satisfying outcomes to me. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Crüxshadows which mentions this album already. There is the review from Brutal Resonance, which I don't know much about as to whether it constitutes a reliable source but even if it is notable one source is not enough. But I can't see any other reviews in reliable sources (there are some blogs and user generated). --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.