Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward Operating Base Echo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I have to agree. WP:SK 1. Redundant to what? No prejudice against a speedy renomination. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forward Operating Base Echo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant. Adel (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy close - nominator fails to advance a policy-based argument for deletion. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Note sure what the nominator means by "redundant". If he means "it no longer exists", that's certainly not a reason for deletion. If he means "it's covered in another article" he needs to be more specific. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.