Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward exchange market

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Foreign exchange market#Forward. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forward exchange market

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Forward exchange market (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article since 2009. With how the article is formatted currently, it might be worth WP:TNT-ing it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, to Foreign exchange market#Forward. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 02:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per SailingInABathTub. There is plausibly a notable topic here (although a cursory search for sources doesn't show up anything that makes it absolutely obvious that we should have an article on this). However, the current article is utterly unsourced and anyone wanting to write this would probably have to start from scratch. I would not be opposed to this being unredirected if/when someone finds some sources and starts writing. (Equally, if someone brings up some reliable sources in the course of this AfD and expands the article, then I'd vote keep.) WJ94 (talk) 12:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect for now per WP:PRESERVE, since we have fine coverage in the target article, but without prejudice to expansion by a new editor. Ovinus (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.