- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted as vandalism, and I doubt that this had a snowball's chance anyways. The page was a how-to page describing a morally and legally dubious scheme to make more money housing foster children by suggesting ways to spend less on their care. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fostercash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no evidence word is used or notable. possible hoax. prod removed with no reason. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G3 - blatant misinformation, so tagged. Guest9999 (talk) 12:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unsourced neologism, I can find no evidence that it is in use, article seems to be using it to try to make a point. JohnCD (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, speedily if possible. WP:SOAP violation, and arguably an attack page. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.