Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundathon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foundathon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism that lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article created by the person who coined the term, I believe, since he also added it to the requested words page at Wiktionary, stating that he had invented it. Equinox (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See this Wiktionary diff as evidence for my comment above: [1]. Equinox (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I also could not find any reliable sources that discuss this neologism. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others, just-invented neologism added to Wikipedia by SPA COI account for promotional purposes. Citobun (talk) 15:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent reliable sourcing offered or to be found. WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.