Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.   -- Lear's Fool 03:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is entirely based off of primary sources and written in a promotional manner. The notability of this organization is in question, too. A gnews search for "Foundation Center" charity results in only 2 hits, one of which is patently not related, the other a side mention of an unrelated library. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 01:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn ^arf_contribs. 01:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there are no reliable secondary sources (e.g. magazines/newspapers) about this company that might explain why it is notable per WP:CORP. I expected there would be, because this looks like a rather large operation, but I have not found any. Also, it appears to be SPAM. Delete and rewrite later when secondary sources are available. - IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no third-party sources, spammy. Stifle (talk) 13:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.