- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fractyl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional character that appears not to pass WP:GNG, sources are all primary, no individual notability asserted. Normally would merge to character list, but no list appears to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Was a convention exclusive character. Holds no notability and is only a footnote in the Beast Wars series. Sarujo (talk) 23:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, to List of Predacons. Mathewignash (talk) 01:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and then possibly redirect to Fractal which, being an important real-world concept, is immeasurably more important than an obscure and irrelevant fictional one. Reyk YO! 04:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - another TF article with questionable notability and poor excuses for "sources". Dwanyewest (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of sources to WP:verify notability. Needs third-party sources, not primary sources and unreliable sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.